|
Post by glasswars on Dec 14, 2003 11:40:00 GMT -5
Yeah, thats right. Saddam was caught! So much for that fat fish. Its a good thing he sucks so bad! There was a post on the Pacific that compared Francos Spain to Saddam. Aside from the same sound in the last sylable, Francos has no relation. I think we should all pledge our support to Francos once more. Also, Savage Lands is trying to get the West Pacific Delegacy in a search for more power to overthrough the NPO. Now thats someone that is like Saddam!
|
|
|
Post by NEWWORLDORDER on Dec 16, 2003 12:19:49 GMT -5
Glad we got the b*stard! Why do the Pacific Army keep harrasing us about not being democratic? I don't see elections being held in The *free* Pacific Army!
|
|
|
Post by Abysseria on Dec 16, 2003 15:16:28 GMT -5
LOL that's an increadibly good point
|
|
Unlimited
Senator / Pacific Surveyor of Foreign Threat
Vanguard of the Pacific Revolution
Posts: 694
|
Post by Unlimited on Dec 16, 2003 15:49:21 GMT -5
Savage doesn't even give the delegate regional controls in their region.
|
|
|
Post by BertramStantrous on Dec 18, 2003 11:39:20 GMT -5
Yay, now Saddam can't fire his weapons of mass destruction at me. I feel safe now.
|
|
|
Post by Tar A on Dec 18, 2003 12:34:19 GMT -5
*cackles evilly and counts her weapons of mass destruction* Er... hello there, Bertram. How are you today?
|
|
|
Post by Mars Sara on Dec 18, 2003 18:12:53 GMT -5
A limbless man could count Saddam Hussein's nuclear weapons on all his fingers, if you catch my drift.
|
|
|
Post by Abysseria on Dec 19, 2003 9:27:54 GMT -5
Oh we catch it. But we went to war to get rid of them! Didn't we? He has them, right?
|
|
|
Post by Mars Sara on Dec 19, 2003 16:51:07 GMT -5
That's exactly the kind of reverse-logic that got us into this war in the first place! We didn't go to war because Saddam had nukes, we concluded that Saddam had nukes because we went to war!! It's really pretty ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by BertramStantrous on Dec 19, 2003 21:43:15 GMT -5
If he had them, wouldn't he have used them on us when we attacked him?
|
|
Sir Paul
Senator / Director of the Pacific Press
This is PNN
Posts: 617
|
Post by Sir Paul on Dec 23, 2003 1:08:02 GMT -5
No, no, no! Bush and Blair weren't talking about weapons of mass destruction, it was weapons of math instruction. It was just a typo. American math professors found 14,098 protracters and 113,203 calculators. What do you have to say about that?
|
|
|
Post by Brezhnev on Dec 23, 2003 3:29:39 GMT -5
A quite easy mistake to make. Scientists are still debating whether there's a difference or not.
|
|
|
Post by Mammothistan on Dec 23, 2003 4:20:59 GMT -5
To sum it all up.
|
|
Blackfield
Liege
Nil mortifi, sine lucre
Posts: 10
|
Post by Blackfield on Dec 23, 2003 8:45:05 GMT -5
If he had them, wouldn't he have used them on us when we attacked him? No, he was too busy using them on his own people!!!! Incidentally, even if it is proven that he doesn't, didn't and never had them, it doesn't excuse the fact that it took 10 years for somebody to remove the murdering b'stard from power. One petty dictatorship down, only another two dozen to go!
|
|
|
Post by Mars Sara on Dec 23, 2003 15:43:31 GMT -5
It's not the United States' job to go around ousting and capturing dictators, then taking over their countries.
|
|