|
|
Post by Praetor on Nov 13, 2003 21:01:17 GMT -5
Recently declassified documents from the files of the Ministry of Security. Lists of deviants that have violated the Civil Code for Uniform Justice and Order in the Pacific and have been punished accordingly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Praetor on Nov 13, 2003 21:10:09 GMT -5
(Originally posted October 28th)
The following UN nations were found yesterday to be endorsing one or more of the foreign aggressors who were invading our region while not endorsing the Delegate. They have been treated as collaborators, and as such, have been expelled from the Pacific.
1824
Abnegatia
Attila el Hun
Bcslayers
Boombule
Chibi chibi
Cobardia
Common Man
Complicity
Corinthe
Deluwiel
Denspark
Dland
Ebonwulf
Ephyon
EvilAngels
Expedition
Familia
Fenway United
Fromage de Chevre
Halif
Hannahcom
Il Bugo
Irisian
Jennivier
Jerashlin
Jubystan
Juskalherria
Kharkov
Khedive
Luna Amore
Marck
Mylanda
Ormrod
Pitrac
Protestant Lanarkshire
Revilotaire
Rexia
Siggi
Spoffin
The Fairstar Fairy
The High V
Tobieski
Wintario
Wolf Allies
(Note: the minority of this list who were in the Pacific preceding yesterday's invasion may appeal their status on this thread. Appeals from the invading nations will not be heard.)
|
|
Francos Spain
Our Blessed and Chosen Leader of the Pacific
Posts: 496
|
Post by Francos Spain on Nov 18, 2003 4:15:01 GMT -5
The following is the list of nations expelled from the Pacific in the attempted invasion of the region on November 8 (including violation of rules Rules 0001 through 0004 and 2003 of the Civil Code). Given that ten days have passed since this, the information should no longer be considered sensitive.
|
|
Francos Spain
Our Blessed and Chosen Leader of the Pacific
Posts: 496
|
Post by Francos Spain on Nov 18, 2003 4:22:29 GMT -5
The following are nations who have recently been removed from the region for having objectionable nation names (Rule 1008 of the Civil Code) :
|
|
|
|
Post by Deringstan on Nov 18, 2003 5:48:04 GMT -5
Yes, in the last list my name is listed. I can explain this. When I joined the United Nations I was recruited by people of the Pacific Army.
I did not join them but I was in a invasion with them. Although it was a big failure the organisation seemed right. It said something about different timezones.
After that I moved back to the Pacific and got annoyed by how the anti-Franco groups act. I don't like spam and looking back to the invasion. The planning was stupid, they attacked with 40 nations, stupid against a delegate with 140 endorsements
I know this will probaby change my chance of becoming a senator to nothing if I had a little bit of chance.
|
|
|
|
Post by Abysseria on Nov 18, 2003 8:47:44 GMT -5
Yes, in the last list my name is listed. I can explain this. When I joined the United Nations I was recruited by people of the Pacific Army. I did not join them but I was in a invasion with them. Although it was a big failure the organisation seemed right. It said something about different timezones. After that I moved back to the Pacific and got annoyed by how the anti-Franco groups act. I don't like spam and looking back to the invasion. The planning was stupid, they attacked with 40 nations, stupid against a delegate with 140 endorsements I know this will probaby change my chance of becoming a senator to nothing if I had a little bit of chance. Leniency to those who confess. It works for the Chinese:) |
|
|
|
Post by Tar A on Nov 18, 2003 12:28:23 GMT -5
Although it was a big failure the organisation seemed right. It said something about different timezones. Uh... lol... the organization was practically non existent. The whole invasion just made a mockery of our opposition. They moved too soon too obviously (not like they hadn't been posting the time and date on the boards the entire week leading up to it). It was child's play to get rid of all of you guys. And they're fooling themselves if they think another invasion of this kind will work where about ten others have failed. |
|
|
|
Post by Abysseria on Nov 18, 2003 13:02:27 GMT -5
Uh... lol... the organization was practically non existent. The whole invasion just made a mockery of our opposition. They moved too soon too obviously (not like they hadn't been posting the time and date on the boards the entire week leading up to it). It was child's play to get rid of all of you guys. And they're fooling themselves if they think another invasion of this kind will work where about ten others have failed. Amen, sister. Preach it!  |
|
|
|
Post by Deringstan on Nov 19, 2003 9:39:48 GMT -5
Yep that's true. A strict organisation is needed in this type of events.
-They posted when they would attack everywhere in the region RadioFree Pacific. Could it be less obvious?
-They used (from what I remember) Savage Lands, Franco probably has (oops had ;D) him in his dossier so he could keep track of him.
-They attacked with 40 people.
True it was a embarrasment. Just like all the other attempts.
|
|
|
|
Post by stromglave on Jan 9, 2004 12:08:45 GMT -5
In all my past I have never fought agents the NPO in open battle. Words yes but ive never join any fights becouse thay are badly put together, Wean I plan one and was going to act on it i was told the allys how seid thay would join in whated to no the in and outs of the plan so thay could tell there troops befor hand. What morons spy are ever were no mater were you look there will be one so why do you talk about battle plans to you troop. Fools that is why i have never been in a attack on the pacific becouse if i did you would have lost with out any way of stoping it my paln will work but the allys will nt work together.
|
|
|
|
Post by BertramStantrous on Feb 27, 2004 2:13:19 GMT -5
In all my past I have never fought agents the NPO in open battle. Words yes but ive never join any fights becouse thay are badly put together, Wean I plan one and was going to act on it i was told the allys how seid thay would join in whated to no the in and outs of the plan so thay could tell there troops befor hand. What morons spy are ever were no mater were you look there will be one so why do you talk about battle plans to you troop. Fools that is why i have never been in a attack on the pacific becouse if i did you would have lost with out any way of stoping it my paln will work but the allys will nt work together. Ha ha, you've still got it, Gettersburg. Every time you make a post, I know you've got another fine piece of comedic (unintelligible) material for us to read (or try to, anyway). You're incredible vanity and your inappropriate god-complex (despite the fact that you're a complete idiot that doesn't do anything of value) are obviously appreciated, as well are your veiled threats. Keep up the good work! |
|
