|
Post by Azerbaijanistanialand on Jan 30, 2004 6:44:59 GMT -5
On Nur: I dont care much either way. But then I dont know the chap, so presumably Id like him if I did. Otherwise Im strictly neutral, as Im sure more than one of us has more history in NS than our involvement in the NPO.
On CG:
That brings up something Ive been wondering about. Is CG actually a native to The Pacific? When I arrived back to the game (after a summer sabbatical) the NPO were already in the Pacific (well I think it was just Franco at the time) so to anyone who was around, was CG a Pacifican, a particularly prominent one?
|
|
|
Post by Warrior Thorin on Jan 30, 2004 9:33:45 GMT -5
She's a pain in the ass more than a native. I guess she did reside in the Pacific, but let's face the facts. First, she has made more attempts to subvert the region than I think anyone else. Two, she keeps a plethora of puppets in the region. Three, her UN nation rarely stays in the Pacific.
My personal belief is that if she would adhere to the Civil Code, she could be a native. Rather, she has taken the position to subvert our region's government with tenacity (and has failed in each attempt). I don't consider her a native because she does not support the only government that has brought stability and peace to the region.
|
|
|
Post by Abysseria on Jan 30, 2004 12:45:26 GMT -5
Whew - a lot to comment on in this thread: RE: Nur - well, ole pal, it looks as if Francos trusts you, then I should as well. I'll work on that. You know we're still buds, but I'm naturally skeptical of you if you can betray so easily. I'm sure over time I'll get to trust you. CG: She was a native, but since then has been pulled in so many directions, her armies can't get it together. It's not even a concern, but it is fun stealing their threads. Lactating Nuns: I love that line, leg humpin dog. Fantastic
|
|
|
Post by The Godly El Sabah Nur on Jan 30, 2004 18:34:43 GMT -5
All you have to do is look at the Pacific Army after Savage - cough, excuse me, Nur- left, and CG took over. If they've been reduced to running to other feeder region delegates to post threads like that, well... I don't think I need to say anything more. Er, and to put my two cents in about Sav, he was my friend before I knew he was NPO, and he's still my friend. All the same, it's great fun to give him a hard time now and then I really need to research who this "Savage" was that My flock is always talking about. From what I've gathered, he was truly a great man.......
|
|
|
Post by Azerbaijanistanialand on Jan 31, 2004 17:08:22 GMT -5
I really need to research who this "Savage" was that My flock is always talking about. From what I'gathered, he was truly a great man....... I like a man who's consistent, even if its in thier delusions.
|
|
Wabu-Dhati
Liege
The power within each of you is wasted when kept amongst yourselves. Give it to us.
Posts: 47
|
Post by Wabu-Dhati on Jan 31, 2004 21:22:55 GMT -5
CG is, from my brief conversations with her after invasion day, an anarchist. She won't have any respect for any civil code, including one that is self evidently for the betterment of the Pacific.
However, there is a way around this. Perhaps we can use her to our advantage. Send a note around suggesting that CG is working for us. Eject supporters, and then have them say that she was the one who betrayed their 'anti-Franco' stance.
Make her seem an unprincipled liar, a coward who is after self-aggrandisement. Spread it on thick, and we'll even have her believing it.
That is, if she's even on anymore. Haven't seen much action from her lately.
*Note: The ejected nations will, of course, be allowed back in and then told to lie low for a while.
|
|
|
Post by The Godly El Sabah Nur on Jan 31, 2004 22:01:12 GMT -5
CG is, from my brief conversations with her after invasion day, an anarchist. She won't have any respect for any civil code, including one that is self evidently for the betterment of the Pacific. However, there is a way around this. Perhaps we can use her to our advantage. Send a note around suggesting that CG is working for us. Eject supporters, and then have them say that she was the one who betrayed their 'anti-Franco' stance. Make her seem an unprincipled liar, a coward who is after self-aggrandisement. Spread it on thick, and we'll even have her believing it. That is, if she's even on anymore. Haven't seen much action from her lately. *Note: The ejected nations will, of course, be allowed back in and then told to lie low for a while. A good plan, child, but what's wrong with self-aggrandisement?
|
|
Wabu-Dhati
Liege
The power within each of you is wasted when kept amongst yourselves. Give it to us.
Posts: 47
|
Post by Wabu-Dhati on Feb 1, 2004 0:33:34 GMT -5
To you and I, brother, servants of the greater good, nothing.
However, to so-called 'freedom fighters', the mere accusation could wreck the respect of their allies, fragmenting them even further.
Anything that weakens our enemies must be explored and exploited.
|
|
|
Post by Abysseria on Feb 2, 2004 8:39:32 GMT -5
Last time I checked, you can get in trouble for spamming with false telegrams? Isn't that correct?
|
|
|
Post by Azerbaijanistanialand on Feb 2, 2004 8:43:50 GMT -5
I dont think he's suggesting a spam campaighn. A few neatly placed rumour-o-grams would suffice.
|
|
|
Post by Abysseria on Feb 2, 2004 12:01:35 GMT -5
I would just suggest caution with that tactic - after all, FS did get in trouble for such a thing, and I would hate to see our region bitch slapped again by the moderators, especially when we KNOW it's wrong this time.
|
|
|
Post by Azerbaijanistanialand on Feb 2, 2004 13:57:23 GMT -5
Plus the fact that this is a very public board means that if such a campaighn was started with puppets, we'd find it hard to deny responsibility.
|
|
Wabu-Dhati
Liege
The power within each of you is wasted when kept amongst yourselves. Give it to us.
Posts: 47
|
Post by Wabu-Dhati on Feb 3, 2004 4:03:01 GMT -5
Well, perhaps that's the problem. Maybe we should make almost all of the message board private.
Still, consider my idea, and if you don't like it I'll send a few more out for discussion.
(By the way, our 'exiles' would be posting in the moderation or Gameplay forums. Not telegramming, though I'd leave that in the hands of the people carrying it out.)
|
|
|
Post by Azerbaijanistanialand on Feb 3, 2004 4:39:02 GMT -5
Well, perhaps that's the problem. Maybe we should make almost all of the message board private. Still, consider my idea, and if you don't like it I'll send a few more out for discussion. (By the way, our 'exiles' would be posting in the moderation or Gameplay forums. Not telegramming, though I'd leave that in the hands of the people carrying it out.) It is a mark of the NPO's openness that our boards are so open. Our rivals are free to come here and engage in discourse provided it is civil and courteous. I think having more restricted access forums would be a bad idea.
|
|
|
Post by Abysseria on Feb 3, 2004 8:53:04 GMT -5
I second that idea. On more than one occaision, I have made use of the fact in defending the NPO
|
|