|
Post by Lesser Cambodia on Sept 10, 2003 21:53:52 GMT -5
Would it be possible to obtain more detailed descriptions of the offenses committed by the nations listed by the Court? Vague terminology such as "treason," "political ineptitude," and "sins against the state" is good for a brief listing, but more in-depth reports should be readily available as well, if only to maintain the accountability of the Court. What do you think, Francos?
|
|
Francos Spain
Our Blessed and Chosen Leader of the Pacific
Posts: 496
|
Post by Francos Spain on Sept 11, 2003 14:45:47 GMT -5
Bear in mind that I am not in charge of the Pacific court, but since you ask me directly, I shall reply.
The paperwork that would be required for all that would become too cumbersome. When members of the Pac. Army start to see that we have to fill out forms every time we eject one of their puppets, they'd send them in en masse in an attempt to grief the region more than they already are.
|
|
|
Post by Lesser Cambodia on Sept 11, 2003 18:16:03 GMT -5
Thank you for your prompt and well-reasoned response. It is nice to see that issues are quickly dealt with in the new Pacific.
|
|
|
Post by Melicanium on Sept 27, 2003 16:01:57 GMT -5
Don't a few of them already send in puppets all the time? I hear they've been annoying you guys.
|
|
|
Post by Unfree People on Oct 31, 2003 12:20:29 GMT -5
A lot of those puppets aren't ours. Believe it or not, we do have better things to do with our time than make stupid nations with 5 mill pops to "grief" you.
|
|
|
Post by Mammothistan on Oct 31, 2003 20:16:51 GMT -5
Records indicate otherwise.
|
|
Francos Spain
Our Blessed and Chosen Leader of the Pacific
Posts: 496
|
Post by Francos Spain on Nov 1, 2003 6:03:10 GMT -5
A lot of those puppets aren't ours. Believe it or not, we do have better things to do with our time than make stupid nations with 5 mill pops to "grief" you. Ah! Ah hah hah! AHAHAHA! Yeah RIGHT ![/b][/size] Not only do you indeed have nothing better to do, but you guys practically live to flood the Pacific with puppets. Maybe you should ask a few of your degenerate neighbors if they're behind the puppet-thon before making such broad assumptions.
|
|
|
Post by Unfree People on Nov 1, 2003 11:01:44 GMT -5
It's really not true that the Pacific Army is the only region that doesn't like you. In fact, a great deal of our support comes from seperate regions. And while we do have many puppets in the Pacific, those are generally keeping quiet.
Of course there are a few exceptions. But a lot of those annoying spammers are simply nations from the RR who have a personal thing against you. And I personally have never had a puppet ejected for a spam campaign against you. And there are better ways of trying to fight than making puppets all the time.
(Btw, I'm not trying to flame you on your own board. I'll stop or leave if you wish.)
|
|
|
Post by Jor Kaline of Tekari on Nov 1, 2003 23:51:22 GMT -5
By no means am I attempting to tell you what to do, as a new nation member of the New Pacific I would not dare attempt to.
However, I believe this thread was not created to debate the logic of flooding another region or the motives of this so-called "Pacific Army" but rather to answer and discuss a worthy question brought up by my colleague, Qulan Tse of Lesser Cambodia.
Let us not clog up a perfectly good thread when it is something that can be discussed in the General forum, or simply not at all.
Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by BertramStantrous on Nov 2, 2003 4:38:24 GMT -5
By no means am I attempting to tell you what to do, as a new nation member of the New Pacific I would not dare attempt to. However, I believe this thread was not created to debate the logic of flooding another region or the motives of this so-called "Pacific Army" but rather to answer and discuss a worthy question brought up by my colleague, Qulan Tse of Lesser Cambodia. Let us not clog up a perfectly good thread when it is something that can be discussed in the General forum, or simply not at all. Thank you. Hey, this isn't the NationStates forums. The moderators aren't going to delete your nation for "getting off subject" here. Besides, we enjoy decent conversation. There's nothing wrong with letting it evolve over time.
|
|
Francos Spain
Our Blessed and Chosen Leader of the Pacific
Posts: 496
|
Post by Francos Spain on Nov 2, 2003 6:49:07 GMT -5
Threads created by players may be steered in whatever direction the players wish. Threads created by government officials, on the other hand...
|
|
|
Post by Jor Kaline of Tekari on Nov 2, 2003 10:53:59 GMT -5
My apologies, as I stated above I am was not attempting to tell anyone what to do, simply making a suggestion.
I have pledged my support for Francos Spain and for the New Pacific Administration because I believe that they have and continue to do a superb job. If not for that reason, then for the simple fact that I am a member nation I should be able to voice my suggestions. Right?
|
|
|
Post by Lesser Cambodia on Nov 2, 2003 22:21:41 GMT -5
I've seen the Pacific Army's dealings firsthand; I was even a conspirator for a short while until the whole ordeal began to frustrate me. The main theme of every discussion in that particular organization is usually as follows:
PA Member #1: I really hate Francos. PA Member #2: Yeah, he sucks. PA Member #1: Let's go spam some people so they don't endorse Francos. PA Leader: Good idea. Tell everyone to go send spam, and let's hope it works this time as opposed to the other hundred or so times when it hasn't.
It's not the most ingeniously structured rebellion, and they are sincerely confused and angered as to why Francos Spain bans their puppet spammer nations every time they circulate their libel around the Pacific. I'm sure all of you have noticed that at times the spamming increases in rate; these are the days following an important PA meeting where it was decided that spam was the best "solution" to remove Francos Spain from the delegacy. They're just a mess.
|
|
|
Post by Abysseria on Nov 3, 2003 9:14:53 GMT -5
I've seen the Pacific Army's dealings firsthand; I was even a conspirator for a short while until the whole ordeal began to frustrate me. The main theme of every discussion in that particular organization is usually as follows: PA Member #1: I really hate Francos. PA Member #2: Yeah, he sucks. PA Member #1: Let's go spam some people so they don't endorse Francos. PA Leader: Good idea. Tell everyone to go send spam, and let's hope it works this time as opposed to the other hundred or so times when it hasn't. It's not the most ingeniously structured rebellion, and they are sincerely confused and angered as to why Francos Spain bans their puppet spammer nations every time they circulate their libel around the Pacific. I'm sure all of you have noticed that at times the spamming increases in rate; these are the days following an important PA meeting where it was decided that spam was the best "solution" to remove Francos Spain from the delegacy. They're just a mess. Agreed. You think they would come up with a more efective method, but no matter. What I like most about the Pacific is that Francos, as delegate, has enabled my nation to develop free of intrigue and politics. We are free to be the nation we develop into. There's nothing wrong with that!
|
|
|
Post by Alantino on Nov 5, 2003 13:27:23 GMT -5
Agreed. You think they would come up with a more efective method, but no matter. What I like most about the Pacific is that Francos, as delegate, has enabled my nation to develop free of intrigue and politics. We are free to be the nation we develop into. There's nothing wrong with that! OOC: I think there should be thousands of worlds with one map, so that everyone will have and will know who they're dealing with. not 100 of thousands of users. That's just too complicating. What do you think about signing up, filling up a world on a map and when that's full, another world will be made to fill up?
|
|