|
ADN
Aug 22, 2004 14:53:55 GMT -5
Post by Warrior Thorin on Aug 22, 2004 14:53:55 GMT -5
Though I do not speak for the ADN, I believe it is to stop members from becoming affiliated and allied if they become interested. It's rather interesting that the ADN states that there is no freedom of speech in the Pacific, and yet the regulate with whom members may talk to.
|
|
|
ADN
Aug 22, 2004 15:30:54 GMT -5
Post by LadyRebels on Aug 22, 2004 15:30:54 GMT -5
EMPIRE EMPIRE EMPIRE....*dances with scissors* EMPIRE EMPIRE EMPIRE *runs up behind BA and replaces the sharp pointy scissors with some nice safe ones, then pats his tush and says* Have fun...... ;D *ducks out as he looks shocked, moving very very quickly*
|
|
|
ADN
Aug 22, 2004 15:38:24 GMT -5
Post by RedCommunist on Aug 22, 2004 15:38:24 GMT -5
No, WT what gets me is how they say there is no free speech in the pacific yet they keep sending people here to bash us and we have yet to ban or delete their accounts. Looks like free speech to me...
|
|
|
ADN
Aug 22, 2004 18:17:16 GMT -5
Post by Warrior Thorin on Aug 22, 2004 18:17:16 GMT -5
Good point, RC!
|
|
|
ADN
Aug 23, 2004 3:49:50 GMT -5
Post by loistopia on Aug 23, 2004 3:49:50 GMT -5
I am new here but I have a question. Everyone is only allowed only one UN nation. So if the NPO attacked the ADN wouldn't that open us up for a counter attack. I mean if most ADN regions have founders wouldn't it be useless to attack. It seems like the NPO has more to fear from the ADN than the ADN does the NPO.
|
|
|
ADN
Aug 23, 2004 4:00:40 GMT -5
Post by Black Adder on Aug 23, 2004 4:00:40 GMT -5
Truth is a fearsome thing Loistopia. Not everyone likes to look at what really lies underneath labels. They've been sold on an idea and are unwilling to question it. We know what we are and we're an affront to many. Thing is most of what we are they are too. They don't want to look at that.
|
|
|
ADN
Aug 23, 2004 8:07:47 GMT -5
Post by RedCommunist on Aug 23, 2004 8:07:47 GMT -5
BA just nailed it, very good.
Thanks WT.
|
|